Jeremy Porter

New York Communications Consultant

  • Home
  • Start here: Comms 101
  • About Jeremy
  • Clients
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • More
    • Advertising 101
    • Writing resources
    • Subscribe

Three notes you must hit when making a political TV ad

August 20, 2014, By Jeremy Porter

Can you guess which of these political ads works? The major political parties are off and running in New Zealand’s federal election.
National Party Election ad 2014

National Party election ad 2014

There’s no formula for creating a great political ad, but there are notes that must be hit: a coherent narrative, an appeal to emotion, and a strong message about what the party or candidate stands for.

Yesterday the two major political parties in New Zealand released their first TVCs for the upcoming election. They couldn’t be more different.

National

The National Party’s first 2014 election ad.

Labour

The Labour Party’s first 2014 election ad.

The National ad — ticks the boxes

When you’re the incumbent it is critical to show that the country is on the right track. The National ad does that. The team of rowers working together and ripping through the water in a straight line is a powerful, emotive metaphor. It evokes strength, momentum, and direction. Kiwis are good rowers — throw in some national pride — why not? Other positives:

  • It compliments kiwis by applauding their hard work (flattery can work);
  • It has a single idea: stay on course or risk it all on the other mob;
  • It uses a powerful persuasive device: contrast. We see a boat of Labour and Green people flapping around in the water going nowhere.

The ad isn’t perfect. The boat is going backwards.  Opposition campaigns should already be at work on parody spots.

The Labour ad — gets it wrong

The difference between the ads couldn’t be more stark. The Labour ad has no emotive appeal, no focus, and no narrative. I can see what Labour is trying to do. They want to show they are standing up for ordinary Kiwis. They desperately want them to know what their policies are. It’s a laundry list ad and it’s awful.

In political communication, when you state what you stand for it needs to cut both ways — it must also define your opponent. Is the National Party against affordable housing, better jobs, or parents spending more time with their kids? In the mind of the voter, unlikely. The result is 30 seconds that says very little.

Visually, it’s problematic. Instead of  depicting themselves as standing with people in the community they are standing in suits outside parliament. Politicians are already seen by voters as detached. The last thing a political party should do is reinforce that in its advertising.

‘Daisy’ — an ad that hit the right notes

Consider one of the greatest political ads of all time. This spot for Lyndon Johnson ran once in 1964. No policy, no laundry list, no pictures of the candidate. What did it have? Powerful emotive appeal, clear narrative, and left the viewer in no doubt about what Johnson stood for and against. It was devastatingly effective.

People also read:

  • Two candidate ads that helped elect two mayorsTwo candidate ads that helped elect two mayors
  • One message for Democrats in the 2014 midterm electionsOne message for Democrats in the 2014 midterm elections
  • The Political Brain by Drew WestenThe Political Brain by Drew Westen

Get great content delivered monthly

If you liked this article why not join the others who receive my newsletter? Find inspiration, get ideas, and improve your communication.

Popular this week

  • Three ways research helps communication
  • Know your issue? You also need to know how to frame it
  • Jeremy Porter – freelance communications strategist
  • A step by step guide to creating great key messages
  • Message grid: Ill, Blame, Cure, Consequence

Search

© Jeremy Porter